Paper 3 Section B

Communication from a very young age is very important when it comes to a relationship between parents and their children. 5-year-old Raina has a conversation with her mother. The 5-year-old seems to be comfortable with her mom, as she is able to carry on a conversation with her. Her mother seemed to be understanding what her five-year-old Raina was saying. Raina seemed to be struggling when they were walking in the countryside. Raina told her mom, “look (.) this way (.) I´m going to (.) going to (.) go over here” Her mother seemed to not like the idea of Raina going that way because she was going to get dirty, her mother tried to distract Raina by stating, ¨look at that birdie (.) up in that tree..¨ Raina clearly understood what her mom was saying.
Raina is in the post-telegraphic stage. During this stage, young children acquire the skills to use language more in complex sentences, but not entirely. In this stage, children start using coordinating conjunctions, such as ´and´ and ´but’ as we as the subordinating conjunction ´because´. In the case of Raina, she had acquired this level, as she said, ¨.. Can I go in the long grass and chase it¨ Raina used a complex sentence when speaking to her mother. The mother seemed to be talking to Raina the same way Raina was talking to her. This accelerates the learning process because the mother is not pressuring her to accelerate her learning ability.
Language acquisition support device theory is included in their conversation because the mother is helping her daughter understand complex sentences. The mother is helping her daughter by using micropauses in her sentences. For example, ¨look (.) you´ll get dirty down there¨ The micropauses help Raina´s ability to understand because her mother is giving her a pause in between complex sentences, so Raina is able to fully comprehend the meaning. The child-directed or caretaker speech is included in their conversation because the mother is acting like a caretaker toward her daughter. For example, ¨no (.) don't chase it (.) we´ll stick to the path¨ Adults usually use this theory when talking to infants or young children. This theory is used to reduce the complexity of sentences. In this case, the mother was talking to her daughter in a complex way but she was reducing the complexity by using pauses in second and micropauses.
After that being said, Raina´s main stage would be preoperational. This theory focuses mainly on children between the ages of three years old and five years old. This theory helps children understand the world around them through images. During this stage, parents play a very important role in the development of their children. Children in this stage are more likely to copy the behaviors of people around them, but mostly their parents. In this case, Raina is copying the way her mother talks to her, as she uses the same micropauses and pauses in seconds that her mother does.
The conversation between the mother and her 5-year-old daughter had many micropauses, pauses in seconds, speech overlap, underlying, and many upper letters. Raina´s overall lexis seemed advanced compared to other children her age. People could argue that this is due to the fact that her mother acted as a caretaker when speaking to her. Most 5 years–old children do not use as many complex sentences as Raina did when talking to her mother. The conversation between both of them would be totally different than two adults talking to each other because the adults would not have as many micropauses and other features used as a five-year-old.
AO1: 3/5 Hi Estefany! I feel that you did show that you understand the text. You reference various characteristic features, but your language is unsure of yourself. An example includes your repetitive use of “seems” in the first paragraph. You do define the post-telegraphic stage very well, and I feel this is one of your strongest areas.
ReplyDeleteAO4: 9/15 As I stated you described various theories very well. This includes the preoperational theory and post telegraphic theory. You refrained from stating the theorist in each of these theories though. As this is part of the mark scheme, it is vital that you include this.
AO5: 3/5 This section is very similar to AO4, as it requires that you have a selection of language data. You do have a selection, but this data could have been supported better with the theorists and what they contributed.
Total: 15/25
Hi Estefany
ReplyDeleteAO1- 3 marks. I can tell you have a clear understanding of the text however, I would recommend to not repeat the phrase “seems” or “seemed” as much because it makes you come off unsure of yourself. However, you did very well on post-telegraphic stage and language acquisition. I would then give you 3 marks since I can tell you have a clear understanding I would just include more details for next time.
AO4- 10 marks. The theories you mention are very well supported and are in short paragraphs so it is easy to follow along. However, for next time mention the theorist names which will greatly strengthen your argument. I would then give you 10 marks.
AO5- 3 marks. All your details and data is good I just feel like it could have been more detailed again. I would give you 3 marks.
Hey estefany, I liked your blog and enjoyed reading it
ReplyDeleteA01
I noticed that you had a clear understanding of the text through reading your blog, you mentioned plenty of quotes and different things that tied evidence together. You also repeated many words and I feel like you shouldn't do that for when you take the test because it can become boring. 3/5
A04
The theories that you talked about throughout the blog were very good and you used plenty of evidence to support them, Something that you should have done better was mention the creator of the theory to make your knowledge appear greater to the graders. 11 Marks
A05
I would give this section a score of 3 because you have sufficient evidence and data but there could have been more in place to make it stronger